Awareness, protective practices, and the association of LED screen use with premature aging in adults: A cross-sectional study

Authors

  • Sadia Rehman Bahria University Health Sciences Campus, Karachi
  • Seemab Khan PNS Hafeez Hospital,  Bahria University College of Medicine, Islamabad
  • Sana Barkat Ali Bahria University of Health Sciences, Karachi
  • Sana Ahmad Bahria University of Health Sciences, Karachi
  • Anila Bibi Jinnah Sindh Medical University image/svg+xml
  • Muniba Abid Bahria University of Health Sciences, Karachi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66344/jpad.v36i2.3334

Keywords:

Light-Emitting Diodes, Skin Aging, Sunscreening Agents, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Screen Time

Abstract

Background High-energy visible (HEV) blue light from LED screens may contribute to premature skin aging by causing oxidative stress and collagen breakdown, especially with prolonged exposure.

Objective To assess awareness and protective practices regarding LED screen-related skin aging and to determine the association between LED screen exposure and self-reported premature aging indicators among adults.

Methods In PNS Shifa Hospital, Karachi, a cross-section study was conducted from October 2023 to May 2024 after getting ethical approval. The age range of 450 participants was 27-40, who were enrolled in the study. A structured online self-administered questionnaire developed using Google Forms and distributed electronically was used to collect data on demographics, LED screen exposure, sunscreen use, and antioxidant products such as vitamin C serums and antioxidant creams. Statistical analysis was conducted using the SPSS version 29.

Results Among 450 participants, prolonged LED screen exposure was associated with self-reported signs suggestive of premature skin aging, including fine wrinkles, pigmentation, dark circles, and hair-related changes. A considerable proportion of participants were aware of the potential harmful effects of LED exposure; however, the adoption of preventive practices such as sunscreen use and antioxidant products was limited. Significant associations were observed between increased screen time and reported aging-related skin changes.

Conclusion Adherence to protective measures remains insufficient even though awareness is at a moderate level. One of the major factors contributing to premature aging is long-term exposure to LED screens, which calls for better public education and digital photoprotection measures.

 

Author Biographies

  • Sadia Rehman, Bahria University Health Sciences Campus, Karachi

    Department of Biochemistry

  • Seemab Khan, PNS Hafeez Hospital,  Bahria University College of Medicine, Islamabad

    Department of Dermatology

  • Sana Barkat Ali, Bahria University of Health Sciences, Karachi

    Department of Physiology

  • Sana Ahmad, Bahria University of Health Sciences, Karachi

    Department of Biochemistry

  • Anila Bibi, Jinnah Sindh Medical University

    Department of  Biochemistry

  • Muniba Abid, Bahria University of Health Sciences, Karachi

    Department of Biochemistry

References

1. Kumari J, Das K, Babaei M, Rokni GR, Goldust M. The impact of blue light and digital screens on the skin. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2023 Apr;22(4):1185-90. doi: 10.1111/jocd.15576.

2. Christensen T, Johnsen BJ, Bruzell EM. Violet-blue light exposure of the skin: is there need for protection? Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2021;20:615-25. doi:10.1039/d1pp00078a

3. Dong K, Goyarts EC, Pelle E, Trivero J, Pernodet N. Blue light disrupts the circadian rhythm and creates damage in skin cells. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2019;41(6):558-62. doi:10.1111/ics.12572

4. Lawrence KP, Young AR. The effects of blue light on the skin. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2022;21(9):1367-91.

doi:10.1007/s43630-022-00235-7.

5. Liebel F, Kaur S, Ruvolo E, Kollias N, Southall MD. Irradiation of skin with visible light induces reactive oxygen species and matrix-degrading enzymes. J Investig Dermatol. 2012;132(7):1901-7. doi:10.1038/jid.2012.18

6. Duteil L, Cardot-Leccia N, Queille-Roussel C, Maubert Y, Harmelin Y, Boukari F, et al. Differences in visible light-induced pigmentation according to wavelengths: a clinical and histological study in comparison with UVB exposure. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2014 Sep;27(5):822-6. doi: 10.1111/pcmr.12273

7. Kim S, Rainer BM, Qi J, Brown I, Ogurtsova A, Leung S, et al. Clinical and molecular change induced by repeated low-dose visible light exposure in both light-skinned and dark-skinned individuals. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2023 May;39(3):204-12. doi: 10.1111/phpp.12819.

8. Christensen T, Johnsen BJ, Bruzell EM. Violet-blue light exposure of the skin: is there need for protection? Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2021;20(5):615-25. doi:10.1007/s43630-021-00043-9.

9. Austin E, Huang YC, Elmets CA. Blue light and visible light photodamage in skin. Photochem Photobiol. 2021;97(2):223-9. doi:10.1111/php.13338.

10. Amin U, Rana M, Faiz F, Saleem Z, Aslam S. Prevalence and factors of sunscreen use in medical and paramedical students: a cross-sectional study in Punjab, Pakistan. J Pak Assoc Dermatol. 2023;33(3):972-9. doi:10.5455/jpad.20230907

11. Mineroff J, Nguyen JK, Jagdeo J. The importance of photoaging prevention in all skin types: an update on current advancements. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(1):1306-10. doi:10.36849/JDD.7255.

12. Passeron T, Picardo M. Melasma, a photoaging disorder. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2018;31(4):461-465. doi:10.1111/pcmr.12691.

13. Mahmoud BH, Ruvolo E, Hexsel CL, Hamzavi IH, Lim HW. Impact of long-wavelength UVA and visible light on melanocompetent skin. J Invest Dermatol. 2010;130(8):2092-7. doi:10.1038/jid.2010.95.

14. Opländer C, Hidding S, Werners FB, Born M, Pallua N, Suschek CV. Effects of blue light irradiation on human dermal fibroblasts. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2011;103(2):118-25. doi:10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2011.02.002.

15. Narita Y, Fukuoka M. The role of blue light in the pathogenesis of hyperpigmentation and skin aging: A systematic review. Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2022;35(5):289-98. doi:10.1159/000518184

16. He YY, Häder DP. UV radiation-induced formation of reactive oxygen species and oxidative damage in skin. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2022;21(3):321-33. doi:10.1007/s43630-021-00135-6.

17. Passeron T, Krutmann J, Andersen ML, Katta R, Zouboulis CC. Clinical and biological impact of visible light on the skin. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2021;34(4):673-84. doi:10.1111/pcmr.12966.

18. Mori M, Suga Y. Visible light-induced pigmentation and oxidative stress in skin. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2020;33(3):361-71. doi:10.1111/pcmr.13002

19. Matsumura H, Ohshima S. Visible light exposure in dermatology: How it affects skin aging and pigmentation. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2024;49(2):132-8. doi:10.1111/ced.14865

20. Campiche R, Curpen SJ, Lutchmanen-Kolanthan V, Gougeon S, Cherel M, Laurent G. Pigmentation effects of blue light irradiation on skin and the protective role of antioxidants. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2020;42(5):509-18. doi:10.1111/ics.12638.

Downloads

Published

30.06.2026

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

1.
Awareness, protective practices, and the association of LED screen use with premature aging in adults: A cross-sectional study. J Pak Assoc Dermatol [Internet]. 2026 Jun. 30 [cited 2026 Jul. 1];36(2):249-54. Available from: https://www.jpad.com.pk/index.php/jpad/article/view/3334