Comparison of outcome of microneedling with autologus platelet rich plasma verses microneedling with topical insulin in the treatment of post-acne atrophic scars

Authors

  • Sara Mubeen Department of Dermatology, King Edward Medical University/ Mayo Hospital, Lahore
  • Syed Ahmed Ali Gardezi Department of Dermatology, King Edward Medical University/ Mayo Hospital, Lahore
  • Aisha Ghias Department of Dermatology, King Edward Medical University/ Mayo Hospital, Lahore
  • Eima Shaheen Department of Dermatology, King Edward Medical University/ Mayo Hospital, Lahore
  • Zaima Sohail Chaudhry Department of Dermatology, King Edward Medical University/ Mayo Hospital, Lahore
  • Shahbaz Aman Department of Dermatology, King Edward Medical University/ Mayo Hospital, Lahore

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66344/jpad.v33i4.2378

Keywords:

Acne vulgaris, Micro-needling, Platelet Rich Plasma, Insulin, Post-acne atrophic scar

Abstract

Objective To compare the outcome of micro-needling with autologous platelet rich plasma versus micro-needling with topical insulin in the treatment of post-acne atrophic scars.

 

Methods 80 patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were enrolled. Goodman and Baron’s Qualitative Scarring Grading System was used to calculate grade at enrollment and at a monthly interval for total 4 sessions and follow up visit after 2 months of last session. Following micro-needling with a derma roller, topical applications of 2ml of human actrapid insulin was done in group-A and 2ml of PRP in group-B. Percentage reduction of acne scar grade was calculated. Data was analyzed in SPSS v25.0. Chi-square test was applied for Comparison of outcomes in terms of post-treatment percentage reduction of grades from patient’s baseline grade.  P-value of <0.05 was considered significant.

 

Results Males and females were 10(25.0%) and 30(75.0%) respectively in group-A, while 13(32.5%) males and 27(67.5%) females were enrolled in group-B. The mean age of patients was 23.68±5.03 years and 24.48±4.75 years in group-A and B correspondingly. The mean duration of scar was 4.5±2.1 years in group A and 4.9±2.3 years in group B. In group A the mean exposure to sunlight was 4.9±2.3hours and in group B was 4.7±2.1hours. Mean percentage reduction of grades of scar in group-A was 55.42±12.74% and 23.33±16.79% in group-B.

 

Conclusion Micro-needling with insulin has more efficacy than micro-needling with Platelet Rich Plasma in treating acne scars. This combined procedure is cost effective, favourable for all skin types with minimal post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation. Also this novel combination procedure is convenient for both doctors and patients as no high skills are required, no need to take I/V line and less time consuming.

References

1. Simpson NB,Cunliffe WJ.Disorders of sebaceous glands. In: Burns T, Breathnach, Cox N,Griffiths C, editors. Rook’s Text book of Dermatology. 7th ed. Blackwell science. 2004:43-75.

2. Goodman GJ. Post-acne scarring: a review of its pathophysiology and treatment. Dermatol Surg. 2000;26:857-871.

3. Jacob Cl, Dover JS, Kaminer MS. Acne scarring: a classification system and review of treatment options. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2001;45:109-117.

4. Lee WJ, Jung HJ, Lim HJ, Jang YH,Lee SJ, Kim DW. Serial sections of atrophic acne scarshelp in the interpretation of microscopic findings and the selection of good therapeutic modalities. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2013;27:643-646.

5. Goodman GJ. Baron JA. Post acne scarring:a qualitative global scarring grading system. Dermatol Surg. 2006;32(12):1458-66.

6. Alster TS, Graham PM. Micro-needling: a review and practical guide. Dermatol. 2015;1(2):77-81.

7. Kaushik S, Hord A, Denson D, McAllister D, Smitra S, Allen M et al. Lack of pain associated with micro-fabricated micro-needles. Anesthesia and Analgesia. 2001;92(2):502-504.

8. Cohen BE, Elbuluk N. Micro-needling in skin of color: a review of uses and efficacy. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016;74:348-55.

9. Hesseler MJ, Shyam N. Platelet-rich plasma and its utility in the treatment of acne scars: a systematic review. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;80:1730-45.

10. Zhang M, Park G, Zhou B, Luo D. Applications and efficacy of platelet- rich plasma in dermatology: a clinical review. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2018;17(5):660-5.

11. Marx RE. Platelet–rich plasma; evidence to support its use. J Oral Maxillo fac Surg. 2004;62(4):489-96.

12. Kakudo N, Kushida S, Minakata T, Suzuki K, Kusumoto K. Platelet-rich plasma promotes epithelization and angiogenesis in a split thickness skin graft donor site. Med Mol Morphol. 2011;44(4):233-6.

13. Kakudo N, Minakata T, Mitsui T, Kushida S, Notodihardjo FZ, Kusumoto K. Proliferation promoting effect of platelet rich plasma on human adipose derived stem cells and human dermal fibroblasts. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122(5):1352-60.

14. Pawar M,Singh M. Micro-needling with autologous platelet rich plasma versus micro-needling with topical insulin in the treatment of post-acne atrophic scars: a simultaneous split-face comparative study. J Am Academy Dermatol. 2020.

15. Abbas MAM, Elgamal EEAE, Zaky MS, Elsaie ML. Micro-needling with topical vitamin C versus micro-needling with topical insulin in the treatment of atrophic post-acne scars: A split-face study. Dermatol Ther. 2022;35(5):15376.

16. Habbema L, Verhagen R, Van Hal R, Liu Y, Varghese B: Minimally invasive non‐thermal laser technology using laser‐induced optical breakdown for skin rejuvenation. J Biophotonics. 2012;5:194-9.

17. Doddaballapur S: Microneedling with dermaroller. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2009;2:110-111.

18. El-Domyati M, Medhat W: Minimally invasive facial rejuvenation: current concepts and future expectations. Expert Rev Dermatol. 2013;8:565-80.

19. El-Domyati M, Barakat M, Awad S, Medhat W, El-Fakahany H, Farag H. Microneedling Therapy for Atrophic Acne Scars: An Objective Evaluation. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2015;8(7):36–42.

20. Gulanikar AD, Vidholkar R. Efficacy of platelet-rich plasma in acne scars. Clin Dermatol Rev 2019;3:109-14.

21. Aust MC, Reimers K, Repenning C, Stahl F, Jahn S, Guggenheim M, et al. Percutaneous collagen induction: Minimally invasive skin rejuvenation without risk of hyperpigmentation-fact or fiction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122:1553–6

22. .Aust MC, Fernandes D, Kolokythas P, et al. Percutaneous collagen induction therapy: an alternative treatment for scars, wrinkles and skin laxity. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121:1421–29.

23. Fernandes D, Signorini M. Combating photoaging with percutaneous collagen induction. Clin Dermatol. 2008;26:192–99.

24. Porwal S, Chahar YS, Singh PK. A comparative study of combined dermaroller and platelet-rich plasma versus dermaroller alone in acne scars and assessment of quality of life before and after treatment. Indian J Dermatol 2018;63:403-8.

Downloads

Published

12.10.2023

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

1.
Comparison of outcome of microneedling with autologus platelet rich plasma verses microneedling with topical insulin in the treatment of post-acne atrophic scars. J Pak Assoc Dermatol [Internet]. 2023 Oct. 12 [cited 2026 Aug. 12];33(4):1461-8. Available from: https://www.jpad.com.pk/index.php/jpad/article/view/2378