Profile of Contact Dermatitis in Elderly Patients

Authors

  • Damayanti Damayanti Department of Dermatology Venereology and Aesthetic, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia/ Department of Dermatology Venereology and Aesthetic, Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Aulia Anisa Putri Faculty of Medicine Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Raden Argarini Department of Physiology and Medical Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Sylvia Anggraeni Department of Dermatology Venereology and Aesthetic, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia/ Department of Dermatology Venereology and Aesthetic, Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Fitra Tri Kurniasari Department of Dermatology Venereology and Aesthetic, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia/ Department of Dermatology Venereology and Aesthetic, Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Safira Fakhrizah Wildani Faculty of Medicine Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia

Keywords:

Contact dermatitis, epidemiology, elderly, human and health

Abstract

Background: Contact dermatitis (CD) is one of the most common inflammatory skin disorders. Decreased skin function in the elderly, such as decreased collagen synthesis, hydration, and sebum production that causes dry skin and changes in immunological responses, are risk factors for CD in the elderly. Objective: To determine the profile of contact dermatitis in the elderly. Methods: This study is a descriptive retrospective study conducted at the Dermatology and Venereology outpatient unit of Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital Surabaya, with a population of contact dermatitis patients aged 50 years or older, using total sampling methods in a 3-year period. Results: The number of elderly patients was 9,063 out of 32,226 patients (0.28%) at the Dermatology and Venereology outpatient unit of Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital Surabaya for 3 years (2019-2022). Out of the 9,063 elderly patients, there were 90 elderly CD patients (0.90%), representing 18.33% of the total 491 CD patients, consisting of allergic contact dermatitis (53.3%) and irritant contact dermatitis (46.7%), with an age range of 50-90 years (mean 61.1±7.9). The most causative agents in ACD were cosmetics (40.1%) and medicated oils (33.3%), while in ICD were herbal oils (25.9%), detergents (22.4%), and dishwashing soap (18.9%). Conclusion: The prevalence of CD among the elderly for a period of 3 years was 18.33% out of patients diagnosed with CD. Females, aged 55 to 65 years, and working as housewives made up the majority of elderly CD patients, with hand and face dermatitis as the most common manifestation.

References

Brar KK. A review of contact dermatitis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2021;126(1):32-39.

Doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2020.10.003.

Li Y, Li L. Contact Dermatitis: Classifications and Management. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2021;61(3):245-281. Doi: 10.1007/s12016-021-08875-0.

Németh D, Pónyai G. Contact Allergy in the Elderly: A Study of 600 Patients. Life (Basel). 2022;12(8):1228. Doi: 10.3390/life12081228.

Damayanti. Pruritus in elderly: classification and management. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews. 2024;21(1):254-9.

Mazan P, Lesiak A, Narbutt J. Pruritus in elderly patients: review of literature. Forum Dermatologi-cum. 2024; 10(1):1-9.

Proksch E, Brasch J. Role of the Permeability Barrier in Contact Dermatitis. In: Johansen, J.D., Mahler, V., Lepoittevin, JP., Frosch, P.J. (eds) Contact Der-matitis. Springer, Cham. 2021.

Yu J, Johnson H, DeKoven JG, Warshaw EM, Taylor JS, Belsito DV, et al. Patch Test Results Among Older Adults: A Retrospective Analysis of the North American Contact Dermatitis® Group Data (2009-2020). Dermatitis. 2024;35(3):235-241.

Doi: 10.1089/derm.2023.0130.

Yıldız E, Çölkesen F, Arslan Ş, Evcen R, Aykan FS, Kılınç M, et al. Allergic diseases in the elderly population: a single-center experience. Turk J Med Sci. 2021;51(5):2631-2640. Doi: 10.3906/sag-2104-55.

Ginting E, Damayanti D, Fetarayani D, Hidayati AN. Contact Dermatitis in Tertiary Hospital: A 2-year Retrospective Study. Berk Ilmu Kesehat Kulit Kelamin. 2021;33(2):88–92.

Salvati, L., Vanni, E., Acciai, M.C. et al. A gender-specific approach to occupational allergic contact dermatitis. Allergo J Int. 2021;30:109–14.

Schütte MG, Tamminga SJ, de Groene GJ, Kezic S, van der Molen HF. Work-related and personal risk factors for occupational contact dermatitis: A systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis. Contact Dermatitis. 2023;88(3):171-187. Doi: 10.1111/cod.14253..

Damayanti, Putri NS, Triesayuningtyas DC, Fir-dausi H, Astindari, Indranarum T, et al. The Corre-lation between Comorbid Factors and Xerosis Cutis in Elderly. J Pak Assoc Dermatol. 2023;33(2):507-12.

Kitagaki H. Skin Health of the Elderly and People

in Long-term Care. Current Cosmetic Science. 2023; 2:e200323214765.

Karagounis TK, Cohen DE. Occupational Hand Dermatitis. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2023;23(4):201-212. Doi: 10.1007/s11882-023-01070-5.

Damayanti, Astindari, Indranarum T, Hadiwidjaja FN, Axelia PG, Mappamasing H. Knowledge Imp-rovement of Xerosis Cutis through Health Educat-ion in the Elderly. Berk Ilmu Kesehat Kulit Kelamin. 2022; 34(3): 174–7.

Turrentine JEE, Sheehan MP, Cruz PD. Allergic Contact Dermatitis. In: Fitzpatrick’s Dermatology. New York: McGraw-Hill Education. 2019. Pp.395-413.

Nedorost ST. Irritant Dermatitis. In: Fitzpatrick’s Dermatology. New York: McGraw-Hill Education. 2019. pp.414-427

Japundžić I, Novak-Hlebar I, Špiljak B, Kuna M, Yale K, Lugović-Mihić L. Skin Features Important for the Occurrence of Contact Dermatitis in Healthcare Workers. Acta Clin Croat. 2022;61(4):692-702. Doi: 10.20471/acc.2022.61.04.16.

Patel K, Nixon R. Irritant Contact Dermatitis - a Review. Curr Dermatol Rep. 2022;11(2):41-51.

doi: 10.1007/s13671-021-00351-4

Tramontana M, Hansel K, Bianchi L, Sensini C, Malatesta N, Stingeni L. Advancing the understanding of allergic contact dermatitis: from pathophysiology to novel therapeutic approaches. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023;10:1184289.

Doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1184289. .

Loman L, Uter W, Armario-Hita JC, Ayala F, Balato A, Ballmer-Weber BK, et al; ES-SCA Working Group. European Surveillance Sys-tem on Contact Allergies (ESSCA): Characteristics of patient’s patch tested and diagnosed with irri-tant contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis. 2021; 85(2): 186–97.

Lin PH, Tseng YH, Chu CY. Changing trends of contact allergens: A 40-year retrospective study from a referral centre in northern Taiwan. Contact Dermatitis. 2021;85(1):39-45.

Doi: 10.1111/cod.13795.

Widipriyatama GR, Damayanti, Dewanti L, Anggr-aeni S. Clinical Profile of Contact Dermatitis Pati-ents at the Allergy-Immunology Division of Der-matology and Venereology Outpatient Clinic. Berk Ilmu Kesehat Kulit Kelamin. 2023;35(2): 100–106.

Atwater AR, Petty AJ, Liu B, Green CL, Silverberg JI, DeKoven JG, et al. Contact dermatitis associated with preservatives: Retrospective analysis of North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 1994 through 2016. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;84(4):965-976. Doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.07.059.

Dickel H, Bauer A, Brehler R, Mahler V, Merk HF, Neustädter I, et al. German S1 guideline: Contact dermatitis. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2022;20(5):712-734. Doi: 10.1111/ddg.14734.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31

How to Cite

1.
Damayanti D, Aulia Anisa Putri, Raden Argarini, Sylvia Anggraeni, Fitra Tri Kurniasari, Safira Fakhrizah Wildani. Profile of Contact Dermatitis in Elderly Patients. J Pak Assoc Dermatol [Internet]. 2025Dec.31 [cited 2026Jan.21];35(4):297-304. Available from: https://www.jpad.com.pk/index.php/jpad/article/view/3045

Issue

Section

Original Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)