Comparison of single versus burst-pulse mode in IPL in patients with acne vulgaris

Authors

  • Shumaila Aslam Consultant Dermatologist, DHQ Hospital, Jhang
  • Atif Shehzad Department of Dermatology, KEMC/ Mayo Hospital, Lahore
  • Saadia Siddiqui Department of Dermatology, SIMS/ Services Hospital, Lahore

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66344/jpad.v31i3.1860

Abstract

Background Acne vulgaris is a very frequently occurring disease in adolescence and adulthood.  The coalescence of adverse impacts of systemic and topical anti acne treatments, antimicrobial resistance and inclination for high tech strategies has led to a new interest in light based acne treatment. Intense pulsed light (IPL) has been utilized to treat facial acne. Data on local population is not available that compares single versus burst-pulse mode in IPL in acne vulgaris patients.

 

Objective To compare the outcomes of single versus burst-pulse mode in IPL in patients having acne vulgaris.

 

Methods A Randomized controlled trail was conducted at the Department of dermatology, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital Lahore. 300 Patients were randomly split up into two groups (150 each). In group-A burst-pulse mode was used to treat the patients, and in group-B the patients were managed with single-pulse mode. Forearm was selected to apply the test dose with IPL, and the most endurable dosage was chosen. Acne global severity scale was calculated at baseline and after completion of four sessions. Percentage improvement in acne global severity scale was calculated.

 

Results  The mean age of cases was 29.86±9.62 years. Overall there were 72(24%) male and 228(76%) female cases. The mean Acne global severity scale at baseline was 3.10±0.83 in Single pulse mode and 3.07±0.87 in Burst-pulse mode with no significant difference.  The mean Acne global severity scale at 4th week was 1.58±0.50 and 1.39±0.75 with significantly lower score and Burst-Pulse mode, p-value < 0.05.  The mean percentage improvement in single pulse mode was 49.56±16.41% and in Burst-Pulse mode was 63±18.98 %. The mean percentage improvement in Burst –pulse mode was significantly higher than single pulse mode, p-value < 0.001.

 

Conclusion As per findings of the study, it is concluded that at 4th week percentage improvement was significantly higher in burst-pulse mode in IPL as compared to single-pulse mode in patients with acne vulgaris. So, using Burst-pulse mode can achieve early recovery and can reduce the severity of the disease. Combining IPL with systemic and topical medications can improve the effectiveness of this treatment.

 

References

1. Williams HC, Dellavalle RP, Garner S. Acne vulgaris. The Lancet.379(9813):361-72.

2. Pei S, Inamadar AC, Adya KA, Tsoukas MM. Light-based therapies in acne treatment. Ind Dermatol Online J. 2015;6(3):145.

3. Gieler U, Gieler T, Kupfer J. Acne and quality of life–impact and management. J Europ Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015;29(S4):12-4.

4. Dawson AL, Dellavalle RP. Acne vulgaris. BMJ.2013;346.

5. Barikbin B, Ayatollahi A, Younespour S, Hejazi S. Evaluation of efficacy of intense pulsed light (IPL) system in the treatment of facial acne vulgaris: comparision of different pulse durations; A Pilot Study. J Lasers in Med Sci.2011;2(2):67-72.

6. Babar O, Mobeen A. Prevalence and psychological impact of acne vulgaris in female undergraduate medical students of Rawalpindi and Islamabad, Pakistan. Cureus.2019;11(9).

7. Wheeland RG, Dhawan S. Evaluation of self-treatment of mild-to-moderate facial acne with a blue light treatment system. J Drugs Dermatol.2011;10(6):596-602.

8. Suva MA, Patel AM, Sharma N, Bhattacharya C, Mangi RK. A brief review on acne vulgaris: pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment. Research & Reviews: J Pharmacol.2015;4(3).

9. Bhate K, Williams H. Epidemiology of acne vulgaris. Br J Dermatol.2013;168(3):474-85.

10. Alexiades M. Laser and light-based treatments of acne and acne scarring. Clin Dermatol.2017;35(2):183-9.

11. Kumaresan M, Srinivas CR. Efficacy of ipl in treatment of acne vulgaris : comparison of single- and burst-pulse mode in IPL. Indian J Dermatol.2010;55(4):370-2.

12. Deshpande AJ. Efficacy and safety evaluation of high-density intense pulsed light in the treatment of grades II and IV acne vulgaris as monotherapy in dark-skinned women of child bearing age. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol.2018;11(4):43.

13. Kumaresan M, Srinivas CJIjod. Efficacy of IPL in treatment of acne vulgaris: Comparison of single-and burst-pulse mode in IPL. Indian J Dermatol.2010;55(4):370-2.

14. Araviiskaia E, Lopez Estebaranz JL, Pincelli C. Dermocosmetics: beneficial adjuncts in the treatment of acne vulgaris. J Dermatol Treat.2021;32(1):3-10.

15. Zaenglein AL. Acne vulgaris. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(14):1343-52.

16. Kessler E, Flanagan K, Chia C, Rogers C, ANNA GLASER D. Comparison of α‐and β‐Hydroxy Acid Chemical Peels in the Treatment of Mild to Moderately Severe Facial Acne Vulgaris. Dermatol Surg. 2008;34(1):45-51.

17. Khan WZ, Butt G, Altaf F. Efficacy and safety of intense pulsed light in the treatment of mild-to-moderate acne vulgaris. Lasers in Dermatology: Current status. 2017;2(t1):152-7.

18. Lu L, Shi M, Chen Z. Efficacy of IPL therapy for the treatment of acne vulgaris: A meta‐analysis. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2020;19(10):2596-605.

19. Gold MH. Acne and PDT: new techniques with lasers and light sources. Lasers Med Sci.2007;22(2):67-72.

20. Kumaresan M, Srinivas C. Efficacy of IPL in treatment of acne vulgaris: Comparison of single-and burst-pulse mode in IPL. Indian J Dermatol.2010;55(4):370.

21. Elman M, Lask GJJoC, Therapy L. The role of pulsed light and heat energy (LHETM) in acne clearance. J Cosmet Laser Ther.2004;6(2):91-5.

22. Barikbin B, Ayatollahi A, Younespour S, Hejazi S. Evaluation of efficacy of intense pulsed light (IPL) system in the treatment of facial acne vulgaris: comparision of different pulse durations; A Pilot Study. J Lasers Med Sci.2011;2(2):67.

Downloads

Published

10.04.2022

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

1.
Comparison of single versus burst-pulse mode in IPL in patients with acne vulgaris. J Pak Assoc Dermatol [Internet]. 2022 Apr. 10 [cited 2026 Sep. 11];31(3):464-9. Available from: https://www.jpad.com.pk/index.php/jpad/article/view/1860