A clinicodemographic study of lepra reaction in patients attending dermatology department of a tertiary care hospital in Eastern India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66344/jpad.25.4.2015.140Keywords:
Leprosy, lepra reactionAbstract
Objective To find the relative prevalence of lepra reactions among leprosy patients attending Dermatology out-patient department, the pattern of reactions in different types of leprosy and histopathological features of reaction.Methods The study was an institution-based, longitudinal study. A total 316 leprosy cases attended the Dermatology out-patient department (OPD) of a tertiary care hospital in Eastern India.Results Out of 316 leprosy patients, 58 (18.4%) were diagnosed to have lepra reactions and relative prevalence of type 1 and type 2 reaction was 10.4% and 7.9%, respectively. Among 58 patients, 50 fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were considered for final evaluation. Lepra reactions were common in patients over 30 years of age. There was a high male preponderance and the male to female ratio was 4.5:1. More than 60% of the patients belonged to the below poverty line. Farmers and laborers were more affected. Almost 62% of the patients were literates but most of them had primary education only. Type 1 reaction was more common in BT patients (50%), whereas type 2 reaction were more commonly seen in LL patients (32%). Erythema and swelling of the skin lesions, neuritis and edema of hands and feet were common features of type 1 reaction. Fresh crops of tender evanescent nodules, joint pain, neuritis and fever were common in type 2 reaction. Classical histopathological features were present in all the 50 slides examined. In type 1 reaction patients, lymphocytic infiltration (96%), dermal edema (93%), epithelioid cells (78%) and Langhans type giant cells (15%) were the common histological findings. Edema and foamy macrophages were seen in all cases of type 2 reaction patients. However, polymorphonuclear leucocytes and vasculitis were seen in 21 (95%) and 16 (73%) patients, respectively.Conclusion Lepra reactions, both type 1 and 2, occur in about 20% of leprosy patients. Early detection is warranted to avoid complications.References
Noorden SK. Eliminating leprosy as a public health problem. Int J Lepr. 1995;63:559.
Britton WJ, Lockwood DNJ. Leprosy. Lancet. 2004;363:1209-19.
Ridley DS, editor. Leprosy. Geneva: Documenta Ciba-Geigy; 1977. P. 47-51.
Lienhardt C, Fine PEM. Type 1 reaction, neuritis and disability in leprosy. What is the current epidemiology situation. Lepr Rev. 1994;65:9-33.
Van Brakel WH, Khawas IB, Lucas S. Reactions in leprosy: an epidemiological study of 386 patients in West Nepal. Lepr Rev. 1994;65:190-203.
Kumar B, Dogra S, Kaur I. Epidemiological characteristics of leprosy reaction; 15 years experience from North India. Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis. 2004;72:125-33.
Wilson JR, Bliss L, Malema SS et al. Extended schooling and good housing conditions are associated with reduced risk of leprosy in rural Malawi. Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis. 1999;62:345-52.
Pfaltzgraff RE, Gopalramu. Clinical leprosy. In: Hastings RC, Ed. Leprosy. 2nd edn. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1994. P.193-224
Jopling WH, McDougall AC, eds. The Handbook of Leprosy. 5th edn. New Delhi: CBS Publishers; 1996.
Radia KB, Ridley DS. The histological course of reactions in borderline leprosy and their outcome. Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis. 1981;49:383-92.
Sharma VK. Classification and clinical features of leprosy. In: Valia RJ, Ed. IADVL Textbook and Atlas of Dermatology. 2nd edn. Mumbai: Bhalani Publishing House; 2001. P. 1578-1603.
Seghal VN. Reactions in leprosy. Int J Dermatol. 1987;26:278-84
Job CK. Pathology of leprosy. In: Hastings RC, Ed. Leprosy. 2nd edn. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1994. P. 193-224.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Submission declaration
Authors retain the copyright to their work and grant the 'Journal of Pakistan Association of Dermatologists (JPAD)' the right of first publication under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. This license allows others to share, adapt, and reuse the work for any purpose, including commercial use, as long as appropriate credit is given to the original authors and the journal.
By submitting a manuscript, authors confirm that the work has not been published previously (except as an abstract, lecture, or academic thesis), is not under review elsewhere, and has been approved by all authors and relevant authorities. Once accepted, the article will be openly accessible under the CC BY 4.0 license, ensuring wide dissemination and reuse with proper attribution.