Role of serodiagnosis in cutaneous leishmaniasis

Authors

  • Simeen ber Rahman
  • Arfan ul Bari
  • Haroon ur Rashid

Keywords:

Cutaneous leishmaniasis, serological tests, enzyme-linked-immunosorbent assay (ELISA), immunofluorescent antibody test (IFAT), indirect hemagglutination test (IHT)

Abstract

Background Cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by different species of Leishmania parasite, is endemic in various regions of Pakistan. It is probably the second most prevalent vector-borne disease in the country (after malaria). Diagnosis is mostly made by its clinical presentation, especially in the endemic areas. Sometimes it is aided by slit skin smear examination, histopathological study and parasite culture. Considering the fact that serology has made significant advances in diagnosing various parasitological diseases, this study was carried out to evaluate the role of serological techniques in diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis. Patients and methods Three serological tests i.e. enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, immunofluorescent antibody test, indirect hemagglutination test were done in 57 clinically diagnosed cases of cutaneous leishmaniasis. Results Positive results were seen in 62.4%, 52% and 52% with ELISA, IFAT, and IHA tests respectively. Conclusion Serological tests can be used as a supporting and screening investigation but not to make the final diagnosis. >  Conclusion Autologous skin punch grafting is a safe, effective and promising mode of treatment in cases of localized fixed vitiligo. 

References

Grevelink SA, Lerner EA. Leishmaniasis. J Am Acad Dermatol 1996; 34: 257-72.

Lainson R, Shaw JJ. Evolution, classification, and geographical distribution. In: Peters W, Killick-Kendrick R, eds. The leishmaniasis in biology and medicine. San Diego: Academic Press; 1987. p. 1-120.

Raja KM, Khan AA, Hameed A, Rahman SB. Unusual clinical variants of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Pakistan. Br J Dermatol 1998; 139: 111-3.

Mujtaba G, Khalid M. Cutaneous leishmaniasis in Multan, Pakistan. Int J Dermatol 1998; 37: 843-6.

Bergan RS. Leishmania, touch preparation as a rapid mean of diagnosis. J Am Acad Dermatol 1986; 16: 1096-1105.

Ridley DS. The laboratory diagnosis of tropical diseases: Review. J Clin Pathol 1974; 27: 435-44.

Sharquie KE, Hassen AS, Hassan SA, Al-Hamami IA. Evaluation of diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis by direct smear, culture and histopathology. Saudi Med J 2002; 23: 925-8.

Manuel J, Behin R, eds. Immunology of parasitic infections, 2nd edn. Sidney: Cotton and Kenneth Swarren; 1982.

Voller A, Bidweil D. Antigen detection by Elisa. Asean J Clin Sci 1985; 5; 121-3.

Follador I, Araujo C, Bacellar O et al. Epidemiologic and immunologic findings for the subclinical form of Leishmania braziliensis infection. Clin Infect Dis 2002; 34: 54-8.

Ryan JR, Smithyman AM, Rajasekariah GH et al. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay based on soluble promastigote antigen detects immunoglobulin M (IgM) and IgG antibodies in sera from cases of visceral and cutaneous leishmaniasis. J Clin Microbiol 2002; 40: 1037-43.

Ridley DS. A histological classification of cutaneous leishmaniasis and its geographical expression. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1980; 74: 515-9.

Downloads

Published

2017-01-03

How to Cite

1.
Rahman S ber, Bari A ul, Rashid H ur. Role of serodiagnosis in cutaneous leishmaniasis. J Pak Assoc Dermatol [Internet]. 2017Jan.3 [cited 2026Mar.19];13(4):171-4. Available from: https://www.jpad.com.pk/index.php/jpad/article/view/758

Issue

Section

Original Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 3 4 5