Comparison of fine needle aspiration with biopsy in the diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis
Keywords:
Cutaneous leishmaniasis, fine needle aspiration, histopathologyAbstract
Background Leishmaniasis is a zoonotic infection caused by the protozoa belonging to the genusLeishmania. Demonstration of Leishman-Donovan (LD) bodies on histopathological examination ofbiopsy specimen is considered to be the definitive diagnostic modality. This study was designed toassess the diagnostic value of fine needle aspiration and to compare it with full thickness biopsy.Patients and methods This was randomized, open label comparison study conducted in departmentof dermatology, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Islamabad from 1st June 2007 to 31st July2007. 15 patients, 15 years of age or older were enrolled in the study. Selection of patients wasmade on the basis of clinical features. Patients with the lesions having typical clinical features ofcutaneous leishmaniasis-like erythematous crusted plaques or nodules were enrolled. Demographiccharacteristics including age, sex, residential address, site, size, shape and duration of lesions wasnoted. Informed consent was taken. Procedure and its pros and cons were explained to the patient.Procedure was performed in the FNA room of pathology department under strict aseptic conditions.Local anaesthesia was not given as patients tolerated the pain well. Biopsy specimen was taken fromthe same lesion under local anaesthesia after doing FNA. Slides were processed and examined. Thediagnosis was confirmed on the basis of finding giant cells or Leishman-Donovan bodies on FNA ofthe lesion.Results Out of 15 patients 12 patients had positive FNA and three patients had negative FNA report.While the biopsy specimen showed typical histopathological features of cutaneous leishmaniasis in14 out of 15 patients and one turned out to be a case of ruptured inclusion cyst. So out of 3 negativecases of FNA, one had ruptured inclusion cyst. The diagnostic rate was 80% for FNA and 93.3% forbiopsy.Conclusion Fine needle aspiration seems a reasonably good diagnostic modality for cutaneousleishmaniasis. Its sensitivity is comparable to that of full thickness biopsy.References
World Health Organization (WHO): Weekly
epidemiological record 2002; Vol 77 (No.
: 365-72.
Magill AJ. Leishmaniasis. In: Hunter GW,
Strickland GT, eds. Hunter's Tropical
Medicine and Emerging Infectious Diseases,
th edn. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2000. p.
-87.
Vega-Lopez F, Hay RJ. Leishmaniasis. In:
Burns T, Breathnach S, Cox N, Griffiths C,
eds. Rook’s Textbook of Dermatology, 7th
edn. London: Blackwell Science; 2004. p.
35-47.
Kolaczinski J, Brooker S, Reyburn H,
Rowland M. Epidemiology of anthroponotic
cutaneous leishmaniasis in Afghan refugee
camps in Northwest Pakistan. Trans R Soc
Trop Med Hyg 2004; 98: 373-8.
Bhutto AM, Soomro RA, Nonaka S,
Hashiguchi Y. Detection of new endemic
areas of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Pakistan:
a 6-year study. Int J Dermatol 2003; 42:
-8.
Yasinzai MM, Iqbal J, Kakar JK et al.
Leishmaniasis in Pakistan: re-visited. J Coll
Physicians Surg Pak 1996; 6: 70.
Rogers ME, Ilg T, Nikolaev AV et al.
Transmission of cutaneous leishmaniasis by
sand flies is enhanced by regurgitation of
fPPG. Nature 2004; 430: 463-7.
Faber WR, Oskam L, van Gool T et al.
Value of diagnostic techniques for
cutaneous leishmaniasis. J Am Acad
Dermatol 2003; 49: 70-4.
Rahman S, Bari A. Laboratory profile in
patients of cutaneous Leishmaniasis from
various regions of Pakistan. J Coll
Physicians Surg Pak. 2003; 13: 313-6.
Zijlstra EE, El-Hassan AM. Leishmanin
and tuberculin sensitivity in leishmaniasis in
the Sudan, with special reference to kalaazar.
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1993; 87:
-7.
Tierney LM, McPhee SJ, Papadakis MA,
eds. Current Medical Diagnosis & Treatment
, 44th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill;