Contact sensitizers in dyshidrotic eczema

Authors

  • Shobhna Kajal Dayanand Medical College and Hospital , Ludhiana (Punjab)
  • Sunil Kumar Gupta Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana
  • Veenu Gupta Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana
  • Sukhjot Kaur Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana
  • Gurpoonam Jatana Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana
  • Sandeep Kaur Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66344/jpad.v27i4.933

Keywords:

Dyshidrotic eczema, Pompholyx, Patch test, Contact dermatitis.

Abstract

Objective To study the etiological pattern of contact sensitizers in patients of dyshidrotic eczema.

Methods 50 patients of suspected and provisionally diagnosed as having dyshidrotic eczema were subjected to patch test with Indian Standard Battery developed by Contact and Occupational Dermatoses Forum of India (CODFI). Results were read after 48 hours of application and second reading, if required, was taken after 72-96 hours.

Results Patch test analysis of these patients revealed that out of 50 patients 26 (52%) showed positive result with patch test. Paraphenylenediamine (20%) and nickel sulphate (10%) were the commonest allergens, followed by parthenium (8%), fragrance mix (8%) and potassium dichromate (8%).

Conclusion Careful history and examination of the patients helps to ascertain the probable relevant allergen responsible for the disease flare up. The patients of pompholyx with positive patch test results can be advised to avoid these allergens.

Author Biographies

  • Shobhna Kajal, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital , Ludhiana (Punjab)
    PG resident, Department of Dermatology,
  • Sunil Kumar Gupta, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana

    Prof. and Head, Department of Dermatology,

  • Veenu Gupta, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana
    Professor, Department of Microbiology
  • Sukhjot Kaur, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana
    Department of Dermatology, Associate Professor
  • Gurpoonam Jatana, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana
    PG resident, Department of Dermatology,
  • Sandeep Kaur, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana

    Senior Resident, Department of Dermatology

References

1. Smith HR, White IR, Rycroft RJ, McFadden JP. Descriptive comparison of isolated hand dermatitis and other populations at St. John's Contact Dermatitis Clinic. Contact Dermatitis. 2000;43:51-2.

2. Veien NK. Acute and recurrent vesicular hand dermatitis. Dermatol Clin. 2009;27:337-53.

3. Fox T. Clinical lecture on dyshidrosis: an undescribed eruption. Br Med J. 1873;365-6.

4. Ackerman AB, Ragaz A. A plea to expunge the word “eczema” from the lexicon of dermatology and dermatopathology. Arch Dermatol Res. 1982;272:407-20.

5. Berth JJ. Eczema, lichenification, prurigo and erythroderma. In: Burns T, Breathnach S, Cox N, Griffiths C, editors. Rook’s Textbook of Dermatology. 8th edn. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010. p. 23.1-51.

6. Altekrueger I, Ackerman AB. "Eczema" revisited. A status report based upon current textbooks of dermatology. Am J Dermatopathol. 1994;16:517-22.

7. Meding B, Swanbeck G. Epidemiology of different types of hand eczema in an industrial city. Acta Derm Venereol. 1989;69:227-33.

8. Guillet MH, Wierzbicka E, Guillet S, Dagregorio G et al. A 3-year causative study of pompholyx in 120 patients. Arch Dermatol. 2007;143:1504-8.

9. Jain VK, Aggarwal K, Passi S, Gupta S. Role of contact allergens in pompholyx. J Dermatol. 2004;31:188-93.

10. Lodi A, Betti R, Chiarelli G, Urbani CE, Crosti C. Epidemiological, clinical and allergological observations on pompholyx. Contact Dermatitis. 1992;26:17-21.

11. Bryld LE, Agner T, Menné T. Relation between vesicular eruptions on the hands and tinea pedis, atopic dermatitis and nickel allergy. Acta Derm Venereol. 2003;83:186-8.

12. Fredricks MG, Becker FT. Vesicular eruptions of the hands and feet of dyshidrotic type: clinical and therapeutical analysis. AMA Arch Derm Syphilol. 1954;70:107-14.

13. Meding B. Epidemiology of hand eczema in an industrial city. Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh). 1990;153:1-43.

14. DeLeo VA, Suarez SM, Maso MJ. Photoallergic contact dermatitis. Results of photopatch testing in New York, 1985-1990. Arch Dermatol. 1992;128:1513-8.

15. Grauer FH, Lorincz AL. Simultaneous dyshidrosis in monozygotic twins during their separation. Arch Dermatol. 1956;74:250-2.

16. Christensen OB, Möller H. Nickel allergy and hand eczema. Contact Dermatitis. 1975;1:129-35.

17. Lehucher-Michel MP, Koeppel MC, Lanteaume A, Sayag J. Dyshidrotic eczema and occupation: a descriptive study. Contact Dermatitis. 2000;43:200-5.

18. Veien NK, Hattel T, Laurberg G. Plantar Trichophyton rubrum infections may cause dermatophytids on the hands. Acta Derm Venereol. 1994;74:403-4.

19. Katz SA, Samitz HH. Leaching of nickel from stainless steel consumer commodities. Acta Derm Venereol. 1975;55:113-5.

Downloads

Published

27.05.2018

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

1.
Contact sensitizers in dyshidrotic eczema. J Pak Assoc Dermatol [Internet]. 2018 May 27 [cited 2026 Jul. 23];27(4):363-7. Available from: https://www.jpad.com.pk/index.php/jpad/article/view/933