Clinical evaluation of roxithromyin in acne vulgaris: comparison of daily versus alternate day regimen

Authors

  • Jameel Ahmad Shaheen
  • Muhammad Khalid
  • Abdul Kareem
  • Mushtaq Ahmad
  • Noor-ul-Huda Ansari
  • Ishtiaq Ahmad

Keywords:

Roxithromycin, acne vulgaris

Abstract

Roxithromycin, one of the newer macrolides, has been shown to be effective in acne in someclinical trials. These trials have been done with once or twice daily dosage schedules. Asanother closely related macrolide, azithromycin, has been shown to be effective when usedon alternate days, we conducted this trial to see whether an alternate day regimen ofroxithromycin gives comparable results with those of daily regimen or not. One hundred andforty patients were included in the study and were randomly divided in two groups. Patientsin Group-I used 300 mg of roxithromycin orally once daily for eight weeks. Those in Group-II used 300 mg of roxithromycin orally on alternate days for eight weeks. Results could beevaluated in 125 patients, with 15 patients lost to follow up. Out of 60 patients in Group-I,32% showed good(>50%) improvement, 57% moderate (25-50%) and 10% slight (<25%)improvement. Of the 65 evaluable patients in Group-II, 28% showed good, 55% moderateand 14% slight improvement. Using chi-square tests the difference between the results of thetwo groups was found to be insignificant (p>0.5). Side effects noted were transient and werenausea, slight gastric upset and diarrhea in 10% patients in Group-I and 4.6% patients inGroup-II. In conclusion, alternate day dosage regimen is found to be almost equally effectivebut safer and more economical than daily dosage regimen.

References

Thiboutot DM, Strauss JS. Diseases

of the sebaceous glands. In:

Fitzpatrick’s Dermatology in

General Medicine. 6th edn. New

York: McGraw-Hill; 2003. p. 672-

Simpson NB, Cunliffe WJ.

Disorders of the sebaceous glands.

In: Rook’s Textbook of

Dermatology, 7th edn. Oxford:

Blackwell Publishing; 2004. p.

15-43.55.

Akamatsu H, Nishijima S,

Akamatsu M et al. Clinical

evaluation of roxithromycin in

patients with acne. J Int Med Res

; 24:109-14.

Ferahbas A, Utas S, Aykol D et al.

Clinical evaluation of

roxithromycin: a double blind,

placebo-controlled and cross-over

trial in patients with acne vulgaris.

J Dermatol 2004; 31: 6-9.

Kapadia N, Talib A. Acne treated

successfully with azithromycin. Int

J Dermatol 2004; 43: 766-67.

Fernandez-Obregon AC.

Azithromycin for the treatment of

acne. Int J Dermatol 2000; 39: 45-

Clark C. A suggested protocol for

general practice treatment. J

Dermatol Treat 1993; 4 (Suppl 2):S22-3.

Akamatsu H, Tomita T, Horio T.

Effects of roxithromycin on the

production of lipase and neutrophil

chemotactic factor by P. acnes.

Dermatology 2002; 204: 277-80.

Akamatsu H, Horio T.

Concentration of roxithromycin in

the lesions of acne vulgaris. J Int

Med Res 2001; 29: 537-40.

Inni S, Nakajima T, Fukuzato Y et

al. Potential anti-androgenic

activity of roxithromycin in skin. J

Dermatol Sci 2001; 27:147-51.

Parsad D, Pandhi R, Dogra S. A

guide to selection and appropriate

use of macrolides in skin

infections. Am J Clin Dermatol

; 4: 389-97.

Downloads

Published

2016-12-28

How to Cite

1.
Shaheen JA, Khalid M, Kareem A, Ahmad M, Ansari N- ul-H, Ahmad I. Clinical evaluation of roxithromyin in acne vulgaris: comparison of daily versus alternate day regimen. J Pak Assoc Dermatol [Internet]. 2016Dec.28 [cited 2025Apr.23];15(1):32-6. Available from: http://www.jpad.com.pk/index.php/jpad/article/view/615

Issue

Section

Original Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)