Clinical presentations of cutaneous tuberculosis

Authors

  • Najam-us Saher
  • Zarnaz Wahid
  • Ijaz Ahmed
  • Sadaf Ahmed Asim
  • Farzana Riaz

Keywords:

Cutaneous tuberculosis, scrofuloderma, lupus vulgaris, tuberculosis verrucosa cutis, tuberculids

Abstract

Objective To determine the frequency of different clinical presentations of cutaneous tuberculosis in a tertiary care hospital. Methods This cross-sectional study was carried out in the Department of Dermatology, Civil Hospital, Karachi and Department of Dermatology, Ziauddin University, Karachi, over three years from 5th March 2007 to 4th March 2010. Patients of both sexes and all age groups suffering from histologically-confirmed cutaneous tuberculosis for last 1 month to 10 years were enrolled. A detailed history and examination were recorded on a predesigned proforma. The collected data were computed and analyzed. Results 57 diagnosed (biopsy proven) cases of cutaneous tuberculosis comprising 35 females (61.4%) and 22 males (38.6%) were enrolled. The age range was 1 up to 80 years. Among these subjects, half the patients were aged between 11-30 years. 17 patients (29.8%) had the disease for 1-2 years constituting the highest frequency for the duration of illness. Most of the patients i.e. 33 (57.5%) had more than one lesion. The lesions were most commonly seen on limbs in 25 (43.4%) patients, followed by face and neck, trunk and genitalia. Chronic discharging sinuses and plaques were the most common presentations. Scrofuloderma was the most common tuberculosis cutis seen in 35 (62%) patients followed by lupus vulgaris, warty tuberculosis and tuberculids. Overall frequency was higher in females. However, some of the types were more frequent in females while others in males. Mean age of presentation for scrofuloderma was 25.7±16.9 years, warty tuberculosis 25.7±15.9 years, lupus vulgaris 29.4±16.5 years and tuberculids 30±11.9 years (p=0.197). Conclusion Scrofuloderma is the most common clinical presentation of tuberculosis cutis seen in our setting followed by lupus vulgaris, tuberculosis verrucosa cutis and tuberculids. 

References

Lonnroth K, Raviglione M. Global epidemiology of tuberculosis: prospects for control. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;29:481-91.

Abdalla CM, Oliveira ZN, Sotto MN et al. Polymerase chain reaction compared to other laboratory findings and to clinical evaluation in the diagnosis of cutaneous tuberculosis and atypical mycobacteria skin infection. Int J Dermatol. 2008;48:27-35.

Bazex J, Bauriaud R, Margeury MC. Cutaneous Mycobacteriosis. Rev Pract. 1996;46:1603-10.

Degtiz K, Steidl M, Thomas P. Etiology of tuberculids. Lancet. 1993;341:239-40.

Saritha M, Parveen BA, Anandan V et al. Atypical forms of lupus vulgaris- a case series. Int J Dermatol. 2009;48:150-3.

Visser AJ, Heyl T. Skin tuberculosis as seen at Ga-Rankuwa Hospital. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1993;18:507-15.

Yates VM, Ormerod LP. Cutaneous tuberculosis in Blackburn district (U.K.): a 15 year prospective series. Br J Dermatol. 1997;136:483-9.

Kumar B, Rai R, Kaur I. Childhood cutaneous tuberculosis: a study over 25 years from northern India. Int J Dermatol. 2001;40:26-32.

Padmavathy L, Lakshmana RL, Pari T et al. Lupus vulgaris and tuberculosis verrucosa cutis—a clinical, pathological and epidemiological study of 71 cases. Indian J Tuberc. 2008;55:203-9.

Yasmeen N, Kanjee A. Cutaneous tuberculosis: a three year prospective study. J Pak Med Assoc. 2005;55:10-2.

Gawkrodger DJ. Cutaneous Tuberculosis. In: Rook/Wllkillson/Ebling. Textbook of Dermatology. Oxford: Blackwell Science; 1998. pp. 1187-206.

Odom RB, James WD. Tuberculosis. In: Berger TG (eds). Andrew’s Diseases of Skin. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2000. p. 417-26.

Chong LY. Cutaneous tuberculosis and atypical mycobacterial infections. In: Handbook of Dermatology and Venerology. Hong Kong: Social Hygiene Handbook; 2000. P. 12-16.

Gopinathan R, Pandit D, Joshi J et al. Clinicaland morphological variants of cutaneous tuberculosis and its relation to mycobacterium species. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2001;19:193-6.

Chin PW, Koh CK. Wong KT. Cutaneous tuberculosis mimicking cellulites in an immune-suppressed patient. Singapore Med J. 1999;40:44-5.

Sehgal VN, Sardana K, Sharma S. Inadequacy of clinical and/or laboratory criteria for the diagnosis of lupus vulgaris, re-infection cutaneous tuberculosis: fallout/implication of 6 weeks of anti-tubular therapy (ATT) as a precise diagnostic supplement to complete the scheduled regimen. J Dermatology Treat. 2008;19:164-7.

Ramesh V, Misra RS, Beena KR, Mukherjee A. A study of cutaneous tuberculosis in children. Pediatr Dermatol. 1999;16:264-9.

Pandhi D, Reddy BSN, Chowdhary S, Khurana N. Cutaneous tuberculosis in Indian children: the importance of screening for involvement of internal organs. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2004;5:546-51.

Paul MA, Williford PM. Cutaneous tuberculosis in a child: a case report and review. Pediatr Dermatol. 1996;13:386-8.

Mahaisaviriya P, Chaiprasert A, Manonukul J, Khemngern S. Scrofuloderma and Sweet’s syndrome. Int J Dermatol. 2002;41:28-31.

Khan Y, Anwar J, Iqbal P, Kumar A. CutaneousTuberculosis: A study of ten cases. J Pak Assoc Dermatol. 2001;11:6-10.18.

Vasisht P, Sahoo B, Khurana N. Cutaneous tuberculosis in children; a clinicohistological study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2007;21:40-7.

Dhar S; Dhar S. Histopathological features of granulomatous skin diseases: an analysis of 22 skin biopsies. Indian J Dermatol. 2002;47:88-90.

Downloads

Published

2016-12-02

How to Cite

1.
Saher N- us, Wahid Z, Ahmed I, Asim SA, Riaz F. Clinical presentations of cutaneous tuberculosis. J Pak Assoc Dermatol [Internet]. 2016Dec.2 [cited 2025Jan.13];24(2):132-7. Available from: http://www.jpad.com.pk/index.php/jpad/article/view/192

Issue

Section

Original Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>