Comparison of safety and efficacy of low dose isotretinoin versus the conventional dosing regime in the treatment of acne vulgaris

Authors

  • Leena Hafeez Nishtar Hospital Multan Khawaja fareed social security hospital multan
  • Aamina Noureen Khan
  • Abeer Aslam
  • Raheel Tahir
  • Aymon Shafi
  • Ammar Akhtar

Keywords:

Acne vulgaris, Low dose isotretinoin, Efficacy, Safety

Abstract

Background Isotretinoin is a derivative of retinol used in the treatment of acne vulgaris. Treatment with isotretinoin may cause many adverse effects. Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of low dose isotretinoin with the conventional dosing regimen in the treatment of acne vulgaris. Methods This randomized controlled trial study was conducted in the Department of Dermatology Nishtar Hospital Multan form 1st June 2018 to 30th November 2018. A total of 140 patients of both gender with acne vulgaris were included in the study and divided into two groups of 70 sample size by randomization. In group A patients oral isotretinoin 20mg/day and in group B 80mg/day was given for 12 weeks. Final evaluation of efficacy was done after 12 weeks of treatment in both groups. Efficacy and safety was noted. Results Age range in this study was from 15 to 40 years with mean age of 25.114±4.14 years in Group A  while 26.171±3.71 years in Group B. Mean duration of complain was 11.557±4.43 months in Group A  and 11.242±4.38 months in Group B. Mean weight was 62.942±6.42 kg in group A and  62.285±6.01 kg in group B. Mean height was 1.584±0.06 meters in group A and  1.588±0.07 meters in group B. Mean BMI was 25.210±3.33 Kg/m2 in Group A  and 24.851±3.44 Kg/m2 in Group B and mean baseline GAGS score was 25.914±2.04 in Group A  and 26.014±2.88 in Group B. In both groups majority of patients belonged to 15-30 years age group. In both groups majority of patients were female. Efficacy was seen in 50% patients in Group A as compare to 71.4% in Group B (p=0.009). Dry eyes was seen in 31.4% patients in Group A as compare to 42.9% in Group B (p=0.161). Headache was seen in 14.3% patients in Group A as compare to 17.1% in Group B (p=0.642). Conclusion Conventional dosing regimen has more efficacy but less safety than low dose isotretinoin in the treatment of acne vulgaris. 

Author Biography

Leena Hafeez, Nishtar Hospital Multan Khawaja fareed social security hospital multan

Consultant Dermatology 

References

Mukherjee S, Date A, Patravale V, Korting HC, Roeder A, Weindl G. Retinoids in the treatment of skin aging: an overview of clinical efficacy and safety. Clin Interv Aging. 2006;1(4):327–48.

Torzecka JD, Dziankowska-Bartkowiak B, Gerlicz-Kowalczuk Z, Wozniacka A. The use of isotretinoin in low doses and unconventional treatment regimens in different types of acne: a literature review. Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2017;34(1):1–5.

Rademaker M. Isotretinoin dose, duration and relapse. What does 30 years of usage tell us? Australas J Dermatol. 2013;54:157-62.

Rademaker M. Adverse effects of isotretinoin: a retrospective review of 1743 patients started on isotretinoin. Australas J Dermatol. 2010;51:248-53.

Cemil BC, Ayvaz HH, Ozturk G. Effects of isotretinoin on body mass index, serum adiponectin, leptin, and ghrelin levels in acne vulgaris patients. Adv Dermatol Allergol. 2016;33:294-9.

Agarwal US, Besarwal RK, Bhola K. Oral isotretinoin in different dose regimens for acne vulgaris: a randomized comparative trial. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2011;77:688-94.

Sardana K, Garg VK. Efficacy of low-dose isotretinoin in acne vulgaris. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2010;76:7-13.

Szepietowski J, Kapińska-Mrowiecka M, Kaszuba A, et al. Trądzik zwyczajny: patogeneza i leczenie. Konsensus Polskiego Towarzystwa Dermatologicznego. Przegl Dermatol. 2012;99:649–73.

Blasiak RC, Stamey CR, Burkhart CN, Lugo-Somolinos A, Morrell DS. High-dose isotretinoin treatment and the rate of retrial, relapse, and adverse effects in patients with acne vulgaris . JAMA Dermatol. 2013;149(12):1392-8.

Dhaked DR, Meena RS, Maheshwari A, Agarwal US, Purohit S. A randomized comparative trial of two low-dose oral isotretinoin regimens in moderate to severe acne vulgaris. Indian Dermatol Online J. 2016;7:378-85.

Mandekou-Lefaki I, Delli F, Teknetzis A, et al. Low-dose schema of isotretinoin in acne vulgaris. Int J Clin Pharmacol Res. 2003;23:41–6. [PubMed]

Sardana K, Garg VK, Sehgal VN, et al. Efficacy of fixed low-dose isotretinoin (20 mg, alternate days) with topical clindamycin gel in moderately severe acne vulgaris. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2009;23:556–60. [PubMed]

Lee JW, Yoo KH, Park KY, et al. Effectivenes of conventional, low-dose and intermittent oral isotretinoin in the treatment of acne: a randomized, controlled comparative study. Br J Dermatol. 2011;164:1369–75. [PubMed]

Rasi A, Behrangi E, Rohaninasab M, Nahad ZM. Efficacy of fixed daily 20 mg of isotretinoin in moderate to severe scar prone acne. Adv Biomed Res. 2014;3:103. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Kotori MG. Low-dose vitamin “A” tablets – treatment of acne vulgaris. Med Arch. 2015;69:28–30. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Downloads

Published

2020-10-01

How to Cite

1.
Hafeez L, Khan AN, Aslam A, Tahir R, Shafi A, Akhtar A. Comparison of safety and efficacy of low dose isotretinoin versus the conventional dosing regime in the treatment of acne vulgaris. J Pak Assoc Dermatol [Internet]. 2020Oct.1 [cited 2024Dec.2];30(3):423-7. Available from: http://www.jpad.com.pk/index.php/jpad/article/view/1484

Issue

Section

Original Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)